My boys thought we were just going on a camping and hiking trip at Caprock Canyon State park in Texas. Surprise! It was actually a G-Shock review video for the Jim Kinkade YouTube channel. We compared the fit and function of the GW-9500 to the GBD-H2000. So which was better?
You’ll have to watch the above video to find out the details. WARNING: There are buffalo in this video.
If you are too scared to see the buffalo who roam the park and often times occlude the roadways with their mass, here is a summary provided by an entity with no mass, Gemini AI:
Here is a summary of GW-9500 vs. GBD-H2000 — Hiking watch by Jim Kinkade
Jim Kinkade compares two G-Shock watches: the GBD-H2000 and the GW-9500 Mudman. He takes them on a hiking trip to Caprock Canyon State Park to test their features and durability.
GBD-H2000:
- Advanced features: GPS, heart rate monitor, altimeter, barometer, compass.
- Comfortable fit, even for long hikes.
- Requires charging for extended use, especially with GPS and heart rate monitor.
- More accurate elevation tracking.
GW-9500 Mudman:
- Classic G-Shock design, durable and rugged.
- Solar-powered, no need for charging.
- Basic features: altimeter, barometer, compass.
- Less comfortable fit for extended wear.
- Less accurate elevation tracking.
Kinkade concludes that the GBD-H2000 is a better choice for those who need advanced features and comfort, while the GW-9500 is a more rugged and reliable option for those who prioritize durability and simplicity.
Conclusion
Buy the G-Shock Mudman GW-9500 for yourself by clicking here on this affiliate link.
Buy the G-Shock GBD-H2000 by clicking here. Let me know what you think.