Question from YouTube commenter Zlobert: Which G-Shock wears smaller, the DW-6900 or the GD-010?
That’s a good question, so I hit record on my video camera and compared these two G-Shocks!
It’s a 6900, albeit a GW, not DW.
First, it should be noted that I do not own a G-Shock DW-6900, but I do have a GW-6900. What’s the difference between the two? The GW-6900 has Multiband 6 and Tough Solar. So it has additional functionality over the DW-6900, and it costs more.
Since we’re comparing the fit, the additional functions don’t matter. This video is all about the physical dimensions.
By the way, the DW-6900 is a classic G-Shock for the ages. It’s really one of their most popular lines. Buy one for yourself by clicking this affiliate link. It’s a good one to have in your collection.
Often, when G-Shock makes a collaboration watch as a special edition, they use the DW-6900 as the base. That’s why it was noteworthy when G-Shock released its most recent NASA collaboration, they went with the GW-6900. That’s the one that I have.
GD stands for “Good, Dadgum”
Zlobert wanted to compare the fit between the 6900 and the new GD-010. Since I had previously made a post specifically about how this watch fits, I referenced the extensive data published in that investigation.
Essentially, the GD-010 has an interesting fit in that the band isn’t that much longer than other G-Shock watches, but it splays out in such a way it fits well on skinny, wide wrists. If a gentleman has a wrist shaped like a 2×4, he would enjoy it.
Do you have a wrist like a 2×4? Buy the G-Shock GD-010 by clicking here on this affiliate link. It’s has a simple no-frills module that just tells the time. No bluetooth. Nothing too fancy. That’s what you like.
So which fits smaller?
Overall the DW-6900 fits smaller given it hugs the wrist tighter and it has a sharper angle on the band. But the caveat is that the GD-010 is thinner in its body and spread out wider.
Look, I’m a big wrister, so I’m not speaking from experience. But I would surmise as an owner of both that a small wrister would like the 6900 series of watches better. That’s my opinion. If yours is different then write it in the comments so Zlobert can see.
AI Summary
I forgot everything I said in the video so I’m going to have Google’s Gemini AI summarize it for me. Then I’ll cut and paste it below:
Which G-Shock Wears Smaller? A Deep Dive with Jim Kinkade
In this comprehensive guide for jimkinkade.com, Jim Kinkade answers a common question from his viewers: which G-Shock model wears smaller on the wrist? Jim dives into the design and wearability of two popular models, the GW6900 and the GD010, to help you find the perfect watch for your wrist.
The GW6900: A Narrower, More Compact Feel
Jim explains that the G-Shock GW6900, a variation of the classic DW6900, wears smaller than the GD010. Its “watch crotch”—the space where the band attaches—is narrower, causing the band to hug the wrist more closely. While it has a thicker profile, its compact width makes it a great option for those with smaller or average-sized wrists. Jim notes that this model has a “meatball effect” because it’s narrower but thicker, fitting more snugly. He does point out one minor design note: the shroud protecting the light button can occasionally obscure the time when viewed at a specific angle.
The GD010: A Wider, Roomier Profile
In contrast, Jim finds that the G-Shock GD010 wears larger and wider on the wrist. It has a wider “watch crotch” and a flatter profile, which allows the band to splay out and provide a roomier feel. This design is well-suited for individuals with wider or flatter wrists. A key feature Jim highlights is the GD010’s large, highly visible numbers on the display, which make the time easy to read at a glance. Jim describes wearing this watch as feeling “freer and more carefree” due to its more open design.
Other G-Shock Models from Jim’s Collection
Jim also mentions a few other G-Shock models, providing additional recommendations for different wrist sizes and preferences:
- GDB500: Jim says this is the smallest-wearing G-Shock he owns. It’s exceptionally thin and narrow, making it a perfect choice if you find even the GW6900 too large.
- DWH5600: An “updated square” model that Jim notes is also known for its narrow fit.
- Mudmaster GWGB1000: This is Jim’s current watch, and he notes that it’s surprisingly wearable even for those with smaller wrists despite its large size.
Jim’s Final Verdict
Ultimately, Jim concludes that the choice between these two G-Shocks comes down to personal preference and wrist shape. If you prefer a more compact and narrower fit, the GW6900 is the way to go. If you have a wider wrist and enjoy a roomier, more open feel with a highly legible display, the GD010 is the superior choice.
I forgot I talked about this in the video: the GDB500 is the ultimate small wrister’s watch. I just remembered it looking over the AI summary. So maybe in the future I’ll highlight it as such. So stay tuned for that.