Is anyone up in the air trying to decide between the G-Shock Mudman and the GBD-H2000?
If so, here is a video where I compare these two new G-Shock watches. And I like them both! Of course they provide different feature sets. But they have more in common than you might initially think.
If you’re interested in buying the G-Shock Mudman GW-9500, click on this affiliate link. The Mudman has big numbers and a super durable design. It’s the one I would have if I could have only one.
The G-Shock GBD-H2000 gets a lot of wrist time with me because I care about my health. If you want to buy your own, click on this affiliate link. It has a heart rate monitor, which the Mudman does not.
For other details in the comparison, watch the video above, or read this summary below generated by Gemini AI:
This Jim Kinkade video compares the Casio G-Shock Mudman GW-9500 and the GBD-H2000, two popular G-Shock models with distinct strengths and weaknesses.
Key Takeaways:
- Durability: The Mudman excels in durability, built to withstand extreme conditions like mud, shock, and water. The GBD-H2000, while durable, may not be as rugged.
- Features: The Mudman focuses on core outdoor functionality with altimeter, barometer, and compass. The GBD-H2000 offers more advanced features like GPS, heart rate monitoring, and activity tracking, but requires Bluetooth connectivity for full functionality.
- Comfort: The GBD-H2000 is generally more comfortable for everyday wear due to its lighter weight and more ergonomic design. The Mudman can be less comfortable for some due to its thicker and more rugged design.
- Readability: The Mudman can have legibility issues due to multiple LCD layers and potential glare. The GBD-H2000 generally offers better readability.
- Battery Life: The Mudman utilizes solar power, offering excellent battery life. The GBD-H2000 requires charging and battery life can vary depending on usage.
- Bluetooth Connectivity: The GBD-H2000 requires Bluetooth for full functionality, while the Mudman operates independently. Kinkade expresses concerns about the potential drawbacks of Bluetooth connectivity, such as privacy concerns and the risk of software issues.
Kinkade’s Recommendations:
- Mudman: Ideal for those prioritizing extreme durability and core outdoor functionality. Suitable for demanding environments and those who prefer a standalone watch without Bluetooth.
- GBD-H2000: A better choice for those who value advanced fitness tracking features, comfort, and are willing to accept the limitations of Bluetooth connectivity.
Kinkade emphasizes that the best choice depends on individual needs and preferences. He encourages viewers to consider their intended use, desired level of durability, comfort, and the importance of Bluetooth connectivity when making their decision.
Additional Notes:
- The video includes a humorous anecdote about Bill Gates and sleep paralysis to illustrate the difficulty of choosing between the two watches.
- Kinkade also discusses the importance of considering individual needs and preferences when choosing a watch, emphasizing that there is no one-size-fits-all solution.
Well, there you go. The AI thought the Bill Gates story was funny!
Don’t forget to check out my Amazon Shop.