You like big numerals? The Casio AE1500 and the G-Shock Mudman GW-9500 have those juicy digits you can read across the room. So if you’re up in the air about which to choose, this is for you!
Mudman: It retails at $380 and is super tough. The toughest I’ve ever tested. While the digits are large, there is a little bit of glare on the double LCD screen. If you are interested in buying the G-Shock GW-9500, click on this affiliate link.
AE1500: It’s costs just a little more than $20. How can you go wrong? While the watch isn’t nearly as tough as the Mudman, the segments on the display are darker. Go ahead and buy the AE1500 by clicking here on this Amazon affiliate link.
My choice?
The Mudman.
AI Summary
Here is Google Gemini AI’s summary of my video, presented without any warrantee of its accuracy:
The video you linked is about a comparison between the Casio Mudman GW-9500 and the AE-1500 watches. Here is a summary of the video:
Key Comparisons:
- Design and Aesthetics: Both watches share a similar square case design with large, easy-to-read digits. However, the Mudman has a more rugged, outdoor-oriented aesthetic, while the AE-1500 has a more classic, everyday look.
- Legibility: The AE-1500 generally offers better legibility due to its larger, bolder digits and less cluttered display. The Mudman suffers from legibility issues due to multiple LCD layers and glare, especially in certain lighting conditions.
- Durability: Both watches are durable, but the Mudman is built to withstand harsher conditions with its mud resistance and robust construction. The AE-1500, while durable, may not be as rugged as the Mudman.
- Features: The Mudman offers more advanced features like altimeter, barometer, compass, and multi-band 6 atomic timekeeping. The AE-1500 provides basic functions like time, date, stopwatch, timer, and alarms.
- Comfort: The Mudman’s band can be less comfortable for some due to its thicker and more rugged design. The AE-1500 generally offers a more comfortable fit for everyday wear.
- Price: The AE-1500 is significantly more affordable than the Mudman, making it a more budget-friendly option.
Kinkade’s Recommendations:
- AE-1500: Ideal for those prioritizing affordability, comfort, and basic functionality. Excellent for everyday wear and casual use.
- Mudman: Best suited for outdoor enthusiasts and those who need a highly durable watch for demanding environments. However, potential legibility issues should be considered.
Overall:
Kinkade emphasizes that the choice between these two watches depends on individual needs and preferences. He highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each model, helping viewers make an informed decision.
Conclusion
Check out my Amazon shop for cool items like the Casio AE1500. Click here to visit my shop.